CyberAlerts is shutting down on June 30th, 2025. Thank you for your support!
Threat and Vulnerability Intelligence Database
Example Searches:
CVE
Threat Actors
Countries
Vendors
Severity
Known Exploited
CVE-2024-44980 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/xe: Fix opregion leak
Being part o the display, ideally the setup and cleanup would be done by
display itself. However this is a bigger refactor that needs to be done
on both i915 and xe. For now, just fix the leak:
unreferenced object 0xffff8881a0300008 (size 192):
comm "modprobe", pid 4354, jiffies 4295647021
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 87 27 81 88 ff ff 18 80 9b 00 00 c9 ff ff ...'............
18 81 9b 00 00 c9 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace (crc 99260e31):
[] kmemleak_alloc+0x4b/0x80
[] kmalloc_trace_noprof+0x312/0x3d0
[] intel_opregion_setup+0x89/0x700 [xe]
[] xe_display_init_noirq+0x2f/0x90 [xe]
[] xe_device_probe+0x7a3/0xbf0 [xe]
[] xe_pci_probe+0x333/0x5b0 [xe]
[] local_pci_probe+0x48/0xb0
[] pci_device_probe+0xc8/0x280
[] really_probe+0xf8/0x390
[] __driver_probe_device+0x8a/0x170
[] driver_probe_device+0x23/0xb0
[] __driver_attach+0xc7/0x190
[] bus_for_each_dev+0x7d/0xd0
[] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30
[] bus_add_driver+0x117/0x250
(cherry picked from commit 6f4e43a2f771b737d991142ec4f6d4b7ff31fbb4)
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.05% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-44972 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: do not clear page dirty inside extent_write_locked_range()
[BUG]
For subpage + zoned case, the following workload can lead to rsv data
leak at unmount time:
# mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev
# mount $dev $mnt
# fsstress -w -n 8 -d $mnt -s 1709539240
0/0: fiemap - no filename
0/1: copyrange read - no filename
0/2: write - no filename
0/3: rename - no source filename
0/4: creat f0 x:0 0 0
0/4: creat add id=0,parent=-1
0/5: writev f0[259 1 0 0 0 0] [778052,113,965] 0
0/6: ioctl(FIEMAP) f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] [1294220,2291618343991484791,0x10000] -1
0/7: dwrite - xfsctl(XFS_IOC_DIOINFO) f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] return 25, fallback to stat()
0/7: dwrite f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] [696320,102400] 0
# umount $mnt
The dmesg includes the following rsv leak detection warning (all call
trace skipped):
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8653 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1e0/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8654 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1a8/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8660 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1a0/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS info (device sda): last unmount of filesystem 1b4abba9-de34-4f07-9e7f-157...
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.03% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-44965 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mm: Fix pti_clone_pgtable() alignment assumption
Guenter reported dodgy crashes on an i386-nosmp build using GCC-11
that had the form of endless traps until entry stack exhaust and then
#DF from the stack guard.
It turned out that pti_clone_pgtable() had alignment assumptions on
the start address, notably it hard assumes start is PMD aligned. This
is true on x86_64, but very much not true on i386.
These assumptions can cause the end condition to malfunction, leading
to a 'short' clone. Guess what happens when the user mapping has a
short copy of the entry text?
Use the correct increment form for addr to avoid alignment
assumptions.
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.07% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-44960 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: core: Check for unset descriptor
Make sure the descriptor has been set before looking at maxpacket.
This fixes a null pointer panic in this case.
This may happen if the gadget doesn't properly set up the endpoint
for the current speed, or the gadget descriptors are malformed and
the descriptor for the speed/endpoint are not found.
No current gadget driver is known to have this problem, but this
may cause a hard-to-find bug during development of new gadgets.
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.05% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-44958 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/smt: Fix unbalance sched_smt_present dec/inc
I got the following warn report while doing stress test:
jump label: negative count!
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 38 at kernel/jump_label.c:263 static_key_slow_try_dec+0x9d/0xb0
Call Trace:
__static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x16/0x70
sched_cpu_deactivate+0x26e/0x2a0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x3ad/0x10d0
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x3f5/0x680
smpboot_thread_fn+0x56d/0x8d0
kthread+0x309/0x400
ret_from_fork+0x41/0x70
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
Because when cpuset_cpu_inactive() fails in sched_cpu_deactivate(),
the cpu offline failed, but sched_smt_present is decremented before
calling sched_cpu_deactivate(), it leads to unbalanced dec/inc, so
fix it by incrementing sched_smt_present in the error path.
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.05% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-44947 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fuse: Initialize beyond-EOF page contents before setting uptodate
fuse_notify_store(), unlike fuse_do_readpage(), does not enable page
zeroing (because it can be used to change partial page contents).
So fuse_notify_store() must be more careful to fully initialize page
contents (including parts of the page that are beyond end-of-file)
before marking the page uptodate.
The current code can leave beyond-EOF page contents uninitialized, which
makes these uninitialized page contents visible to userspace via mmap().
This is an information leak, but only affects systems which do not
enable init-on-alloc (via CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON=y or the
corresponding kernel command line parameter).
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.76% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-44933 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bnxt_en : Fix memory out-of-bounds in bnxt_fill_hw_rss_tbl()
A recent commit has modified the code in __bnxt_reserve_rings() to
set the default RSS indirection table to default only when the number
of RX rings is changing. While this works for newer firmware that
requires RX ring reservations, it causes the regression on older
firmware not requiring RX ring resrvations (BNXT_NEW_RM() returns
false).
With older firmware, RX ring reservations are not required and so
hw_resc->resv_rx_rings is not always set to the proper value. The
comparison:
if (old_rx_rings != bp->hw_resc.resv_rx_rings)
in __bnxt_reserve_rings() may be false even when the RX rings are
changing. This will cause __bnxt_reserve_rings() to skip setting
the default RSS indirection table to default to match the current
number of RX rings. This may later cause bnxt_fill_hw_rss_tbl() to
use an out-of-range index.
We already have bnxt_check_rss_tbl_no_rmgr() to handle exactly this
scenario. We just need to move it up in bnxt_need_reserve_rings()
to be called unconditionally when using older firmware. Without the
fix, if the TX rings are changing, we'll skip the
bnxt_check_rss_tbl_no_rmgr() call and __bnxt_reserve_rings() may also
skip the bnxt_set_dflt_rss_indir_tbl() call for the reason explained
in the last paragraph. Without setting the default RSS indirection
table to default, it causes the regression:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-boun...
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.04% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-43914 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid5: avoid BUG_ON() while continue reshape after reassembling
Currently, mdadm support --revert-reshape to abort the reshape while
reassembling, as the test 07revert-grow. However, following BUG_ON()
can be triggerred by the test:
kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:6278!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
irq event stamp: 158985
CPU: 6 PID: 891 Comm: md0_reshape Not tainted 6.9.0-03335-g7592a0b0049a #94
RIP: 0010:reshape_request+0x3f1/0xe60
Call Trace:
raid5_sync_request+0x43d/0x550
md_do_sync+0xb7a/0x2110
md_thread+0x294/0x2b0
kthread+0x147/0x1c0
ret_from_fork+0x59/0x70
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Root cause is that --revert-reshape update the raid_disks from 5 to 4,
while reshape position is still set, and after reassembling the array,
reshape position will be read from super block, then during reshape the
checking of 'writepos' that is caculated by old reshape position will
fail.
Fix this panic the easy way first, by converting the BUG_ON() to
WARN_ON(), and stop the reshape if checkings fail.
Noted that mdadm must fix --revert-shape as well, and probably md/raid
should enhance metadata validation as well, however this means
reassemble will fail and there must be user tools to fix the wrong
metadata.
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.05% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-43909 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference for smu7
optimize the code to avoid pass a null pointer (hwmgr->backend)
to function smu7_update_edc_leakage_table.
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.07% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|
|
CVE-2024-43894 |
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/client: fix null pointer dereference in drm_client_modeset_probe
In drm_client_modeset_probe(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is
assigned to modeset->mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer
dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.
CVSS: MEDIUM (5.5) EPSS Score: 0.06% SSVC Exploitation: none
May 4th, 2025 (about 2 months ago)
|